Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Main subject
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Urologia ; 89(4): 616-622, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1662393

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The COVID19 pandemic has caused a redistribution of hospital resources. Prioritization strategies are needed in order to organize elective surgeries. We compared the new Medically Necessary Time-Sensitive score (MeNTS) and its factors (disease, procedure, and patient factors) between operated and deferred cases, and also to a subjective priority scale in the Urology department. METHODS: The MeNTS score and a subjective prioritization scale were prospective applied to all patients included on the surgical waiting list from March 10 to September 9, 2020. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare MeNTS scores between operated and non-operated groups. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare MeNTS scores between three subjective priority groups. RESULTS: A total of 150 cases were operated while 100 were deferred. Median total MeNTS score in the operated group was 39.5 whereas in the non-operated group it was 38 (p = 0.135). Median disease factors score was 9.5 in the operated group and 11 in the non-operated group(p = 0.033). Median procedure factors score was 10 in both groups (p = 0.02). Median patient factors score was 17 in the operated group and 18 in the non-operated group (p = 0.210). Disease factors displayed a significant difference between the three subjective priority groups. CONCLUSIONS: Total MeNTS score does not show significant differences between operated and non-operated patients. However, we demonstrate a relationship between MeNTS disease factors and the operated group as well as with the subjective priority scale.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Elective Surgical Procedures , Humans , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL